[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50BF6A04.4040204@ti.com>
Date:	Wed, 5 Dec 2012 16:36:36 +0100
From:	Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>
To:	Bryan Wu <cooloney@...il.com>
CC:	Richard Purdie <rpurdie@...ys.net>, <linux-leds@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] leds: leds-pwm: Convert to use devm_get_pwm
On 12/04/2012 06:34 PM, Bryan Wu wrote:
> What's best thing I can do is I can merge these patchset into my
> -devel branch, after 3.8 merge window close I will move this -devel
> branch to my for-next branch for 3.9 merge window.
> 
> Does this make sense to you?
Not sure if I can get changes related to leds-pwm through linux-omap in this
way. The practice is that l-o should be 'in a working condition' alone -
without linux-next.
But I'll find something else while waiting for 3.10 to clean up the omap board
files related to this.
-- 
Péter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
