[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121206120532.GA14100@infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2012 07:05:33 -0500
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Martin Steigerwald <Martin@...htvoll.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH, 3.7-rc7, RESEND] fs: revert commit bbdd6808 to fallocate
UAPI
On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 07:45:39AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 2:48 AM, Martin Steigerwald <Martin@...htvoll.de> wrote:
> >
> > Linus, while I am interested in an answer I think that Dave and Christoph
> > as Linux filesystem developers actually deserve one (instead of silently
> > being ignored which is also a decision in this matter).
> >
> > I did not see an answer in linux-2.6 commit log as of today so far.
>
> Christ guys. This whole thread is retarded.
>
> The *ONLY* reason people seem to have for reverting that is a "ooh, my
> feelings are hurt by how this was done, and now I'm a pissy bitch and
> I want to get this reverted".
>
> Stop the f*cking around already.
>
> If you want something reverted, you show me the *technical* reason for
> it. Not the "ooh, I'm so annoyed by how this was done" reason for it.
>
> And if your little feelings got hurt, get your mommy to tuck you in,
> don't email me about it. Because I'm not exactly known for my deep
> emotional understanding and supportive personality, am I?
No, the problem is that the thing is not just a) wrong, but b) only made
it in through sneaky ways.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists