lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20121206120645.GB14100@infradead.org> Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2012 07:06:45 -0500 From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> To: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, Martin Steigerwald <Martin@...htvoll.de>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>, linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH, 3.7-rc7, RESEND] fs: revert commit bbdd6808 to fallocate UAPI On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 12:14:02PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 10:25:17AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > Yes, people can argue that "process" is about technical issues too, > > but let's be honest: our process is fluid. Not everything gets > > reviewed on the mailing list, and people *do* talk about things > > face-to-face at conferences. > > Yes, that is true. > > But we don't review code at conferences. We have mailing lists for > that. I've lost count of the number of times I've heard "post your > code" or "let's take it to the list" or "better to discuss this on > the list where everyone can comment" at conferences such as > Plumbers. It's a standard practise - talk at conferences, review > on mailing lists. Also the only conference outcome I remember is that everyone at LSF except for Ted basically said "no fucking way". -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists