linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHSET cgroup/for-3.8] cpuset: decouple cpuset locking from cgroup core

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20121206165426.GM19802@htj.dyndns.org>
Date:	Thu, 6 Dec 2012 08:54:26 -0800
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
Cc:	Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>, paul@...lmenage.org,
	glommer@...allels.com, containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
	cgroups@...r.kernel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
	bsingharora@...il.com, hannes@...xchg.org,
	kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET cgroup/for-3.8] cpuset: decouple cpuset locking from
 cgroup core

Hey, guys.

On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 02:09:04PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > We shoudn't haste to target this for 3.8, given that we're in late -rc and
> > Michal felt some patches scary and they hasn't got enough review.
> 
> Well, even the original code is scary enough so if the decision should
> be made just based on my feeling then it would be too sensitive
> probably. Anyway I do agree that the series should see review from
> others who are more familiar with the code before considering for
> merging.

It's already too late for 3.8.  All cpuset changes are for 3.9.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/