[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFwDZHXf2FkWugCy4DF+mPTjxvjZH87ydhE5cuFFcJ-dJg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2012 10:19:35 -0800
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Henrik Rydberg <rydberg@...omail.se>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Oops in 3.7-rc8 isolate_free_pages_block()
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 9:55 AM, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de> wrote:
>
> Yeah. I was listening to a talk while I was writing it, a bit cranky and
> didn't see why I should suffer alone.
Makes sense.
> Quasimoto strikes again
Is that Quasimodo's Japanese cousin?
> - end_pfn = min(pfn + pageblock_nr_pages, zone_end_pfn);
> +
> + /*
> + * As pfn may not start aligned, pfn+pageblock_nr_page
> + * may cross a MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES boundary and miss
> + * a pfn_valid check. Ensure isolate_freepages_block()
> + * only scans within a pageblock.
> + */
> + end_pfn = ALIGN(pfn + pageblock_nr_pages, pageblock_nr_pages);
> + end_pfn = min(end_pfn, end_pfn);
Ok, this looks much nicer, except it's obviously buggy. The
min(end_pfn, end_pfn) thing is insane, and I'm sure you meant for that
line to be
+ end_pfn = min(end_pfn, zone_end_pfn);
Henrik, does that - corrected - patch (*instead* of the previous one,
not in addition to) also fix your issue?
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists