[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAErSpo7-hUbvvCYPSwtSYKMKWqu99A5H5R4004rSj5Bmv0593g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2012 11:19:33 -0700
From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, dwmw2@...radead.org,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Subject: Re: Use PCI ROMs from EFI boot services
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 5:52 PM, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 4:51 PM, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org> wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 4:36 PM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
>>> On 12/05/2012 04:15 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>>>>
>>>
>>> I don't see why that isn't the right fix. We copy the data into
>>> boot_params early in the boot; that *is* the official copy as far as the
>>> kernel is concerned.
>>>
>>> So this patch very much seems like The Right Thing.
>>
>> it moves boot_params from __initdata to data.
>
> should be from __initdata to bss
>
>> and just for using pointer to setup_data.
>>
>> should add setup_data pointer instead. so will not waste (4096 - 8) bytes.
I'm not following the whole discussion here, but my impression is that
what's in my -next branch is acceptable
(http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/helgaas/pci.git;a=commitdiff;h=328949ff10f2e3fcb11472571294beed39488342)
If not, please explain further and provide a patch to fix it.
Bjorn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists