lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20121206213133.GB4821@thunk.org> Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2012 16:31:33 -0500 From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu> To: Jeremy Allison <jra@...ba.org> Cc: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, Pavel Shilovsky <piastry@...rsoft.ru>, linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, wine-devel@...ehq.org, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Add O_DENY* flags to fcntl and cifs On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 11:57:52AM -0800, Jeremy Allison wrote: > > And this is where things get really ugly of course :-). > > For the CIFSFS client they're expecting to be able to > just ship them to a Windows server, where they'll > get the (insane) Windows semantics. These semantics > are not what would be wanted on a local filesystem. I'm confused; why would a userspace application need to be able to request this behavior? I can understand why an SMB client might depend on this so it can use Windows' insane cache coherency scheme. Are you trying to let Samba act as a middle man, where a remote file system is mounted on Linux, and then Samba will try to act as a SMB server, so you want to be able to pass through these semantics, i.e.: Windows SMB Server <---> Linux cifs remote file system <---> Linux Samba server <---> Windows SMB client Is this somewhat contrivuewd example the intended use case? Or something else? - Ted -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists