linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] Add O_DENY* flags to fcntl and cifs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20121206213329.GB24076@samba2>
Date:	Thu, 6 Dec 2012 13:33:29 -0800
From:	Jeremy Allison <jra@...ba.org>
To:	Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>, Jeremy Allison <jra@...ba.org>,
	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	Pavel Shilovsky <piastry@...rsoft.ru>,
	linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, wine-devel@...ehq.org,
	linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Add O_DENY* flags to fcntl and cifs

On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 04:31:33PM -0500, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 11:57:52AM -0800, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> > 
> > And this is where things get really ugly of course :-).
> > 
> > For the CIFSFS client they're expecting to be able to
> > just ship them to a Windows server, where they'll
> > get the (insane) Windows semantics. These semantics
> > are not what would be wanted on a local filesystem.
> 
> I'm confused; why would a userspace application need to be able to
> request this behavior?

This isn't my proposal Ted, I'm just commenting on it :-).

Jeremy.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/