linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] Documentation: add docs for 88pm80x dt

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 06 Dec 2012 09:58:06 +0800
From:	Qing Xu <qingx@...vell.com>
To:	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
Cc:	"rob@...dley.net" <rob@...dley.net>,
	"sameo@...ux.intel.com" <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
	"haojian.zhuang@...il.com" <haojian.zhuang@...il.com>,
	"rob.herring@...xeda.com" <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
	Qiao Zhou <zhouqiao@...vell.com>, Chao Xie <cxie4@...vell.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Documentation: add docs for 88pm80x dt

On 12/06/2012 06:55 AM, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Wed,  5 Dec 2012 13:42:00 +0800, Qing Xu <qingx@...vell.com> wrote:
>> From: Qing Xu <qingx@...vell.com>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Qing Xu <qingx@...vell.com>
> No commit text?
>
> This patch needs to be squashed together with the patch that changes the
> driver. There is no value in separating them.
>
>> ---
>>   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/88pm80x.txt |   52 +++++++++++++++++++++
>>   1 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>   create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/88pm80x.txt
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/88pm80x.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/88pm80x.txt
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..8a0ed07
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/88pm80x.txt
>> @@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
>> +* Marvell 88pm80x Power Management IC
>> +
>> +Required parent device properties:
>> +- compatible : "marvell,88pm80x"
>> +- reg : the I2C slave address for the 88pm80x chip
>> +- interrupts : IRQ line for the 88pm80x chip
>> +- interrupt-controller: describes the 88pm80x as an interrupt controller (has its own domain)
>> +- #interrupt-cells : should be 1.
>> +	- The cell is the 88pm80x local IRQ number
>> +
>> +Optional parent device properties:
>> +- marvell,88pm80x-irqmode: inicates whether interrupt status is cleared by read
>> +- marvell,88pm80x-poweraddr: 88pm80x are multi-chips solution. <reg> stores the I2C address
>> +				of one chip, and this property stores the I2C address of
>> +				power related chip.
>> +- marvell,88pm80x-gpadcaddr: 88pm80x are multi-chips solution. <reg> stores the I2C address
>> +				of one chip, and this property stores the I2C address of
>> +				gpadc related chip.
> If it is multichip, then I would expect either a separate node for each
> chip and these properties use phandles (instead of i2c addresses) to
> point to the other chip nodes.
>
> Alternately, if the cluster is described using a single node, then you
> can put all three i2c addresses into the 'reg' property.
>
> g.

combined to one patch. please help review again. Thanks!



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/