[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201212112234.42352.arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 22:34:42 +0000
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: "Russell King - ARM Linux" <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>,
Lior Amsalem <alior@...vell.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Yehuda Yitschak <yehuday@...vell.com>,
Maen Suleiman <maen@...vell.com>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Tawfik Bayouk <tawfik@...vell.com>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...onic-design.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
"Eran Ben-Avi" <benavi@...vell.com>,
Nadav Haklai <nadavh@...vell.com>,
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
Shadi Ammouri <shadi@...vell.com>,
Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC v1 01/16] lib: devres: don't enclose pcim_*() functions in CONFIG_HAS_IOPORT
On Tuesday 11 December 2012, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 04:15:02PM +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Tuesday 11 December 2012, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> > > On Tue, 11 Dec 2012 10:43:49 +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > > On Friday 07 December 2012, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> > > > > The pcim_*() functions are used by the libata-sff subsystem, and this
> > > > > subsystem is used for many SATA drivers on ARM platforms that do not
> > > > > necessarily have I/O ports.
> > > >
> > > > I think this one is wrong as the CONFIG_HAS_IOPORT does not refer to the
> > > > presence of PIO ports but to whether or not they provide an ioport_map
> > > > function. If there is no ioport_map(), devm_pci_iomap will fail to link
> > > > as far as I can tell.
> > >
> > > The problem is that on ARCH_MULTI_V7, ARCH_VEXPRESS is forcefully
> > > enabled. And ARCH_VEXPRESS selects NO_IOPORT.. so you don't have the
> > > pcim_*() functions, and therefore libata-sff.c (needed for many SATA
> > > drivers) will not build. How do you solve this?
> >
> > What you describe here are probable two bugs, and we should fix both:
> >
> > * ARCH_VEXPRESS should not select NO_IOPORT. It's generally wrong
> > to select this in combination with ARCH_MULTIPLATFORM, when some
> > of the other platforms you may enable actually have IOPORT mapping
> > support.
>
> No. ARCH_VEXPRESS selects NO_IOPORT because it does not support
> PCI/ISA IO space. That in itself is reasonable, but what isn't
> reasonable is the negative logic being used. Negative logic in
> the config system always tends to provoke this kind of sillyness
> because you're selecting something to be excluded which another
> platform may require.
Exactly, that is what I meant. Sorry if I wasn't clear enough.
> We should instead have HAVE_IOPORT and platforms which need ISA/PCI IO
> space support should select this symbol instead - so it becomes an
> inclusive feature rather than an exclusive feature.
Right. Note that HAS_IOPORT already exists and is defined as
config HAS_IOPORT
boolean
depends on HAS_IOMEM && !NO_IOPORT
default y
If we change it to
config HAS_IOPORT
boolean
depends on HAS_IOMEM
default !NO_IOPORT
then we can actually select both NO_IOPORT and HAS_IOPORT with the result
of getting HAS_IOPORT. It is a bit confusing though to have both enabled,
so we might still want to use an approach where we only select NO_IOPORT
if we are sure that we can't have it.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists