[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121214200241.GA27195@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 21:02:41 +0100
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: "Suzuki K. Poulose" <suzuki@...ibm.com>
Cc: bigeasy@...utronix.de, ananth@...ibm.com,
srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, peterz@...radead.org,
benh@...nel.crashing.org, mingo@...e.hu, anton@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] uprobes/powerpc: Make use of generic routines
to enable single step
On 12/03, Suzuki K. Poulose wrote:
>
> Replace the ptrace helpers with the powerpc generic routines to
> enable/disable single step. We save/restore the MSR (and DCBR for BookE)
> across for the operation. We don't have to disable the single step,
> as restoring the MSR/DBCR would restore the previous state.
Obviously I can't review this series (although it looks fine to me).
Just one note,
> @@ -121,7 +132,7 @@ int arch_uprobe_post_xol(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, struct pt_regs *regs)
>
> WARN_ON_ONCE(current->thread.trap_nr != UPROBE_TRAP_NR);
>
> - uprobe_restore_context_sstep(&utask->autask);
> + uprobe_restore_context_sstep(&utask->autask, regs);
I am not sure ppc needs this, but note that x86 does a bit more.
Not only we need to restore the "single-step" state, we need to
send SIGTRAP if it was not set by us. The same for _skip_sstep.
But even if I am right I do not suggest to change this series,
this can be done as a separate patch.
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists