[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4511257.Msp501Wi5G@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 00:37:03 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Sivaram Nair <sivaramn@...dia.com>
Cc: ccross@...roid.com, santosh.shilimkar@...com, khilman@...com,
daniel.lezcano@...aro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] cpuidle: coupled: fix ready counter decrement
On Friday, December 14, 2012 10:42:08 AM Sivaram Nair wrote:
> The ready_waiting_counts atomic variable is compared against the wrong
> online cpu count. The latter is computed incorrectly using logical-OR
> instead of bit-OR. This patch fixes that.
I'm queuing this up for submission as v3.8 material.
I suppose it should be marked for -stable too?
Rafael
> Signed-off-by: Sivaram Nair <sivaramn@...dia.com>
> ---
> drivers/cpuidle/coupled.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/coupled.c b/drivers/cpuidle/coupled.c
> index 3265844..2a297f8 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpuidle/coupled.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/coupled.c
> @@ -209,7 +209,7 @@ inline int cpuidle_coupled_set_not_ready(struct cpuidle_coupled *coupled)
> int all;
> int ret;
>
> - all = coupled->online_count || (coupled->online_count << WAITING_BITS);
> + all = coupled->online_count | (coupled->online_count << WAITING_BITS);
> ret = atomic_add_unless(&coupled->ready_waiting_counts,
> -MAX_WAITING_CPUS, all);
>
>
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists