[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121216155953.GN2261@intel.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2012 17:59:53 +0200
From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc: ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI / PM: Do not apply ACPI_SUCCESS() to
acpi_bus_get_device() result
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 02:32:06PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
>
> Since the return value of acpi_bus_get_device() is not of type
> acpi_status, ACPI_SUCCESS() should not be used for checking its
> return value. Fix that.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/device_pm.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux/drivers/acpi/device_pm.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux.orig/drivers/acpi/device_pm.c
> +++ linux/drivers/acpi/device_pm.c
> @@ -358,8 +358,7 @@ static struct acpi_device *acpi_dev_pm_g
> acpi_handle handle = DEVICE_ACPI_HANDLE(dev);
> struct acpi_device *adev;
>
> - return handle && ACPI_SUCCESS(acpi_bus_get_device(handle, &adev)) ?
> - adev : NULL;
> + return handle && !acpi_bus_get_device(handle, &adev) ? adev : NULL;
> }
>
> /**
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists