[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1432424.eSUdEQ1VBT@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2012 14:32:06 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH] ACPI / PM: Do not apply ACPI_SUCCESS() to acpi_bus_get_device() result
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Since the return value of acpi_bus_get_device() is not of type
acpi_status, ACPI_SUCCESS() should not be used for checking its
return value. Fix that.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
---
drivers/acpi/device_pm.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
Index: linux/drivers/acpi/device_pm.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/drivers/acpi/device_pm.c
+++ linux/drivers/acpi/device_pm.c
@@ -358,8 +358,7 @@ static struct acpi_device *acpi_dev_pm_g
acpi_handle handle = DEVICE_ACPI_HANDLE(dev);
struct acpi_device *adev;
- return handle && ACPI_SUCCESS(acpi_bus_get_device(handle, &adev)) ?
- adev : NULL;
+ return handle && !acpi_bus_get_device(handle, &adev) ? adev : NULL;
}
/**
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists