lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2012 19:07:55 +0530 From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org> To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl> Cc: linaro-dev@...ts.linaro.org, nicolas.pitre@...aro.org, amit.kucheria@...aro.org, mathieu.poirier@...aro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cpufreq@...r.kernel.org, pdsw-power-team@....com, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] cpufreq: Manage only online cpus On 16 December 2012 18:34, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl> wrote: > On Sunday, December 16, 2012 11:20:08 AM Viresh Kumar wrote: >> cpufreq core doesn't manage offline cpus and if driver->init() has returned >> mask including offline cpus, it may result in unwanted behavior by cpufreq core >> or governors. >> >> We need to get only online cpus in this mask. There are two places to fix this >> mask, cpufreq core and cpufreq driver. It makes sense to do this at common place >> and hence is done in core. > > Well, this series makes sense to me, but I'd like to hear what the other people > think. That sounds great :) Some more information for others about how i reached to these issues is present here: https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/12/10/44 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists