linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] cpufreq: Manage only online cpus

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 2 Jan 2013 11:59:57 +0530
From:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc:	linaro-dev@...ts.linaro.org, nicolas.pitre@...aro.org,
	amit.kucheria@...aro.org, mathieu.poirier@...aro.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cpufreq@...r.kernel.org,
	pdsw-power-team@....com, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] cpufreq: Manage only online cpus

On 16 December 2012 19:07, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org> wrote:
> On 16 December 2012 18:34, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:

>> Well, this series makes sense to me, but I'd like to hear what the other people
>> think.
>
> That sounds great :)
>
> Some more information for others about how i reached to these issues
> is present here:
>
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/12/10/44

Hmm.. I don't know, if we are going to get any feedback from others :(

BTW, i consider them as fixes and so would make sense to get them in next rc.
What do you think?

--
viresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/