[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20121216211415.0DE793E0BDD@localhost>
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2012 21:14:14 +0000
From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
To: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>
Cc: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>,
spi-devel-general@...ts.sourceforge.net, rob@...dley.net,
rob.herring@...xeda.com, devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org,
Linux OMAP Mailing List <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] spi: devicetree: add support for loopback mode
On Sat, 15 Dec 2012 16:55:46 +0200, Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com> wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 12:32:24AM +0000, Grant Likely wrote:
> > On Wed, 12 Dec 2012 10:46:00 +0200, Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com> wrote:
> > > there are a few spi master drivers which make
> > > use of that flag but there is no way to pass it
> > > through devicetree.
> > >
> > > This patch just creates a way to pass SPI_LOOP
> > > via devicetree.
> >
> > I don't understand how this would be useful since loopback mode is
> > really just a test feature. Is there any reason to do loopback for
> > something other than test?
> >
> > I think it would be better to add a sysfs or debugfs property to
> > manipulate the SPI_LOOP flag from userspace. What do you think?
>
> might be nicer in the long run, indeed. Want me to look into it, or do
> you wanna do it yourself ?
Yes, please look into it. After all, you're the one who needs the feature/ :-)
g.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists