linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] regulator: core: if voltage scaling fails, restore original voltage values

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 17 Dec 2012 15:45:12 +0000
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To:	Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>
Cc:	Paolo Pisati <paolo.pisati@...onical.com>,
	linux-omap <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
	Paul Walmsley <paul@...an.com>, Liam Girdwood <lrg@...com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Robert Nelson <robertcnelson@...il.com>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: core: if voltage scaling fails, restore
 original voltage values

On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 05:18:48PM +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 02:15:36PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:

> > Uh, no.  Think about this for a minute - we want bug fixes backporting,
> > we don't want to be putting process blockers in the way of that
> > especially not in the cases where fixes apply to all the stable kernels
> > that are currently active.

> then omit the  # v3.x, v3.y  part, but Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org should
> still be there

Oh, yes - that's needed.  Sorry, I thought it was the v3.x bit you were
complaining was missing.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)