linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] regulator: core: if voltage scaling fails, restore original voltage values

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 17 Dec 2012 17:18:48 +0200
From:	Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>
To:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
CC:	Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>,
	Paolo Pisati <paolo.pisati@...onical.com>,
	linux-omap <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
	Paul Walmsley <paul@...an.com>, Liam Girdwood <lrg@...com>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Robert Nelson <robertcnelson@...il.com>,
	<stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: core: if voltage scaling fails, restore
 original voltage values

Hi,

On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 02:15:36PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 04:57:38PM +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 11:15:20PM +0900, Mark Brown wrote:
> 
> > > It's perfectly OK to omit this unless there's an awareness that the
> > > backport won't work on some kernels.
> 
> > that's not what Greg says, but fair enough. Won't discuss it...
> 
> Uh, no.  Think about this for a minute - we want bug fixes backporting,
> we don't want to be putting process blockers in the way of that
> especially not in the cases where fixes apply to all the stable kernels
> that are currently active.

then omit the  # v3.x, v3.y  part, but Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org should
still be there

-- 
balbi

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)