[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50CFA6A4.7010805@zytor.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 15:11:32 -0800
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
CC: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"Yu, Fenghua" <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
"mingo@...nel.org" <mingo@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
Stefano Stabellini <Stefano.Stabellini@...citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/microcode] x86/microcode_intel_early.c: Early update
ucode on Intel's CPU
On 12/17/2012 02:47 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>
> Peter, can you check that branch again?
>
> I moved the early_trap_init after init_mem_mapping.
> so for 64bit native, init_mem_mapping will setup page table for ram from blank.
>
Looks better, at first glance at least. There are a couple of
unnecessary changes (the counter in head_64.S cannot exceed 32 bits once
computed, so the change from %rcx to %ecx change is pointless.)
There is another bug in my patch: it either needs to mask off the NX bit
if we are running on non-NX-enabled hardware, or it needs to not set the
NX bit (which is mostly okay that early on, I suspect.)
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists