[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAE9FiQUx-T2ZFyBtrdLjzkUO50LObMv_nOEUNPwU+wPQscD1_A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 15:26:44 -0800
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"Yu, Fenghua" <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
"mingo@...nel.org" <mingo@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
Stefano Stabellini <Stefano.Stabellini@...citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/microcode] x86/microcode_intel_early.c: Early update
ucode on Intel's CPU
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 3:11 PM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
> On 12/17/2012 02:47 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>>
>>
>> Peter, can you check that branch again?
>>
>> I moved the early_trap_init after init_mem_mapping.
>> so for 64bit native, init_mem_mapping will setup page table for ram from
>> blank.
>>
>
> Looks better, at first glance at least. There are a couple of unnecessary
> changes (the counter in head_64.S cannot exceed 32 bits once computed, so
> the change from %rcx to %ecx change is pointless.)
ok, return to use %ecx
>
> There is another bug in my patch: it either needs to mask off the NX bit if
> we are running on non-NX-enabled hardware, or it needs to not set the NX bit
> (which is mostly okay that early on, I suspect.)
i test that in kvm guest, and westmere, current version seem ok.
will repost the patchset to list to get more review.
:
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists