[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50CEDFEB.2030600@ti.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 11:03:39 +0200
From: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...com>
To: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
CC: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-omap <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fbdev <linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Florian Tobias Schandinat <FlorianSchandinat@....de>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>,
Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@...emap.net>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] fbdev changes for 3.8
On 2012-12-16 22:35, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>> Those are all omap internal devices and should be all marked with
>> depends on ARCH_OMAP2PLUS.
>>
>> It's a different story for external devices that may be used on other
>> architectures.
>>
>> I only came up with one reason to compile internal devices for other
>> architectures: In some cases the driver subsystem maintainer may want to
>> be able to compile test subsystem wide changes without having to compile
>> for each target separately. But for those cases it's trivial to carry a
>> compile test patch that just drops the depends Kconfig entries.
>
> And here's a patch to limit the omap drivers above to omap only.
The patch looks good to me.
The reason I removed the OMAP dependency from OMAP DSS was not (only)
because of the compile testing, but also because I thought it was right:
a driver for an IP block shouldn't presume that the IP is used only on
particular SoC.
But perhaps that's a bit too academic approach for an IP that's in real
world only used for OMAP.
Tomi
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (900 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists