[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50D1AD38.7070606@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 13:04:08 +0100
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
gaowanlong@...fujitsu.com, hutao@...fujitsu.com,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, mst@...hat.com,
rusty@...tcorp.com.au, asias@...hat.com, nab@...ux-iscsi.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] virtio: add functions for piecewise addition of
buffers
Il 19/12/2012 11:47, Stefan Hajnoczi ha scritto:
> On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 01:32:48PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> +/**
>> + * virtqueue_start_buf - start building buffer for the other end
>> + * @vq: the struct virtqueue we're talking about.
>> + * @buf: a struct keeping the state of the buffer
>> + * @data: the token identifying the buffer.
>> + * @count: the number of buffers that will be added
>
> Perhaps count should be named count_bufs or num_bufs.
Ok.
>> + * @count_sg: the number of sg lists that will be added
>
> What is the purpose of count_sg?
It is needed to decide whether to use an indirect or a direct buffer.
The idea is to avoid a memory allocation if the driver is providing us
with separate sg elements (under the assumption that they will be few).
Originally I wanted to use a mix of direct and indirect buffer (direct
if add_buf received a one-element scatterlist, otherwise indirect). It
would have had the same effect, without having to specify count_sg in
advance. The spec is not clear if that is allowed or not, but in the
end they do not work with either QEMU or vhost, so I chose this
alternative instead.
Paolo
> Stefan
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists