[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJSP0QUNQHSak_jUWA0jfDuKgfVFsyJb0252OxWzQzUcj653bg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 13:40:57 +0100
From: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...il.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>,
linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
kvm <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
hutao@...fujitsu.com, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Virtualization <virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] virtio: add functions for piecewise addition of buffers
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 1:04 PM, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com> wrote:
> Il 19/12/2012 11:47, Stefan Hajnoczi ha scritto:
>> On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 01:32:48PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> What is the purpose of count_sg?
>
> It is needed to decide whether to use an indirect or a direct buffer.
> The idea is to avoid a memory allocation if the driver is providing us
> with separate sg elements (under the assumption that they will be few).
Ah, this makes sense now. I saw it affects the decision whether to go
indirect or not but it wasn't obvious why.
> Originally I wanted to use a mix of direct and indirect buffer (direct
> if add_buf received a one-element scatterlist, otherwise indirect). It
> would have had the same effect, without having to specify count_sg in
> advance. The spec is not clear if that is allowed or not, but in the
> end they do not work with either QEMU or vhost, so I chose this
> alternative instead.
Okay.
Stefan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists