linux-kernel - Re: BUG: spinlock bad magic on CPU#0 on BeagleBone

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <50D2AF54.7050402@codeaurora.org>
Date:	Wed, 19 Dec 2012 22:25:24 -0800
From:	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To:	"Bedia, Vaibhav" <vaibhav.bedia@...com>
CC:	Paul Walmsley <paul@...an.com>,
	"linux-omap@...r.kernel.org" <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: BUG: spinlock bad magic on CPU#0 on BeagleBone

On 12/19/2012 8:48 PM, Bedia, Vaibhav wrote:
> I tried out 3 variants of AM335x boards - 2 of these (BeagleBone and EVM) have DDR2
> and 1 has DDR3 (EVM-SK). The BUG is triggered on all of these at the same point.
>
> With Stephen's change I don't see this on any of the board variants :)
> New bootlog below.

Great! Can I have your Tested-by then? I'll wrap it up into a patch. Is
this is a new regression? From a glance at the code it looks to have
existed for quite a while now.

-- 
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/