linux-kernel - RE: BUG: spinlock bad magic on CPU#0 on BeagleBone

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 20 Dec 2012 06:44:46 +0000
From:	"Bedia, Vaibhav" <vaibhav.bedia@...com>
To:	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
CC:	Paul Walmsley <paul@...an.com>,
	"linux-omap@...r.kernel.org" <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: BUG: spinlock bad magic on CPU#0 on BeagleBone

On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 11:55:24, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 12/19/2012 8:48 PM, Bedia, Vaibhav wrote:
> > I tried out 3 variants of AM335x boards - 2 of these (BeagleBone and EVM) have DDR2
> > and 1 has DDR3 (EVM-SK). The BUG is triggered on all of these at the same point.
> >
> > With Stephen's change I don't see this on any of the board variants :)
> > New bootlog below.
> 
> Great! Can I have your Tested-by then? I'll wrap it up into a patch. Is
> this is a new regression? From a glance at the code it looks to have
> existed for quite a while now.

I went back to a branch based off 3.7-rc4 and don't see the issue there. Not sure
what is triggering this now.

Tested-by: Vaibhav Bedia <vaibhav.bedia@...com>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/