[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFyiRPk0Qta35PBqMFqn+GkKaugqKJM3WHCT0JEJ1YohWw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 11:00:11 -0800
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
arm@...nel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL v2] ARM: arm-soc fixes for 3.8
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 10:45 AM, Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com> wrote:
>
> I'm seeing the "BUG: spinlock bad magic on CPU#0" issue
> reported and fixed here:
>
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-arm-kernel&m=135594868503683&w=2
>
> But that's probably been already posted as a proper patch
> somewhere?
Hmm. The patch there looks better than any alternative I can think of.
It uses the same spinlock name for the whole array, but I think it's
only used for lockdep printouts, so that should be fine.
Send me the patch with signed-off and tested-by, and perhaps have a
few more people test it. The powerpc and sparc people both use it in
their 32-bit versions and have responsible maintainers, so it might be
worth it double-checking with BenH and DaveM about it, just in case.
Added to the Cc.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists