lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 21 Dec 2012 00:33:19 +0530
From:	Vivek Gautam <gautamvivek1987@...il.com>
To:	Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Cc:	Vivek Gautam <gautam.vivek@...sung.com>, jg1.han@...sung.com,
	yulgon.kim@...sung.com, linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
	Praveen Paneri <p.paneri@...sung.com>,
	gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org,
	linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	balbi@...com, kishon@...com, Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
	Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
	Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
	Sylwester Nawrocki <sylvester.nawrocki@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/4] ARM: EXYNOS: Update & move usb-phy types to
 generic include layer

Hi Doug,

On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 10:23 PM, Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org> wrote:
> Vivek,
>
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 9:51 PM, Vivek Gautam <gautamvivek1987@...il.com> wrote:
>> Hi Doug,
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 3:18 AM, Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org> wrote:
>>> Vivek,
>>>
>>> Since you're changing the name, I would have expected to see a removal
>>> of the old enum type in this patch.  I don't see it.  After applying
>>> all of your patches I find that S5P_USB_PHY_HOST and
>>> S5P_USB_PHY_DEVICE are still defined and used.
>>>
>>
>> True that we should have removed the earlier defined enums, infact i
>> did the same
>> in patchset v4 for this series. But since in this patchset i separated
>> out drivers and
>> architecture part, i thought it would be easier to remove them in one
>> shot in a latter commit
>> which will actually touch upon all architecture related code
>> (mach-exynos/setup-usb-phy.c,
>> mach-s5pv210/setup-usb-phy.c, and include/plat/usb-phy.h) once this
>> approach is accepted.
>>
>>> $ git grep S5P_USB_PHY_HOST
>>> arch/arm/mach-exynos/setup-usb-phy.c:   else if (type == S5P_USB_PHY_HOST)
>>> arch/arm/mach-exynos/setup-usb-phy.c:   else if (type == S5P_USB_PHY_HOST)
>>> arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/usb-phy.h:   S5P_USB_PHY_HOST,
>>>
>>> I believe that those usages of the old enum should also be switched
>>> over and the old enum removed.
>>>
>> Sure, those enums need to be removed.
>> If you say i will submit a patch for the same.
>
> It would be nice to add it to the patch series in the next version.  Thanks!
>

Sure i shall add the same to the arch patches in the next version, or
if needed will send a separate patch for this.

> -Doug



-- 
Thanks & Regards
Vivek
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists