[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121220192441.GC14363@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 19:24:42 +0000
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Steve Glendinning <steve.glendinning@...well.net>,
Robert Marklund <robert.marklund@...ricsson.com>,
linus.walleij@...ricsson.com, arnd@...db.de,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] net/smsc911x: Provide common clock functionality
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 08:12:08PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 6:19 PM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> > Some platforms provide clocks which require enabling before the
> > SMSC911x chip will power on. This patch uses the new common clk
> > framework to do just that. If no clock is provided, it will just
> > be ignored and the driver will continue to assume that no clock
> > is required for the chip to run successfully.
> >
> > Cc: Steve Glendinning <steve.glendinning@...well.net>
> > Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
> > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
>
> Seems to me like it'll do the trick.
> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
This looks fairly dangerous. What about those platforms which use this
driver, but don't provide a clock for it?
It looks like this will result in those platforms losing their ethernet
support. There's at least a bunch of the ARM evaluation boards which
make use of this driver...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists