linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] cgroup: remove redundant check

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <50D365F2.7070607@oracle.com>
Date:	Thu, 20 Dec 2012 14:24:34 -0500
From:	Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>
To:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
CC:	Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>,
	containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cgroup: remove redundant check

On 12/20/2012 02:18 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 02:11:31PM -0500, Sasha Levin wrote:
>> We already know that 'event' is non-NULL, remove the redundant check.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>
> 
> I don't know.  I kinda like that test there.  It's not an error path
> and tearing down everything which could have been allocated.  If the
> test not being used is bothering, convert return -ENOMEM to goto fail?

Can't say it's bothering. If you'd prefer to leave it as is I'm okay with
doing that.


Thanks,
Sasha

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/