[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50D384FE.2070109@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 13:37:02 -0800
From: David Cohen <david.a.cohen@...el.com>
To: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, alan@...ux.intel.com,
"Li, Ning" <ning.li@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] gpio-langwell: implement irq shutdown interface
On 12/19/2012 05:26 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Dec 2012 17:52:13 -0800, David Cohen <david.a.cohen@...el.com> wrote:
>> From: "Li, Ning" <ning.li@...el.com>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: David Cohen <david.a.cohen@...el.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Li, Ning <ning.li@...el.com>
> I could use some help interpreting this patch since it doesn't have any
> commit text describing why this patch is needed, nor does it have any
> comments in the code describing what it is doing.
>
> Having good commit text is important. Use it to tell me and future
> readers why this patch is important. What it does and how it was tested.
> Otherwise I end up trying to read your mind.
>
> (The patch does actually look fine to me, but it isn't okay to neglect
> a patch descirption on anything other than the most trivial of
> patches... and even then it triggers severe eyebrow raising)
Thanks for your reply. I'll add the description and resend it.
Br, David
>
> g.
>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpio/gpio-langwell.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-langwell.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-langwell.c
>> index dc534a9..c702d3d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-langwell.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-langwell.c
>> @@ -219,12 +219,30 @@ static int lnw_irq_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned type)
>>
>> static void lnw_irq_noop(struct irq_data *d) {}
>>
>> +static void lnw_irq_shutdown(struct irq_data *d)
>> +{
>> + struct lnw_gpio *lnw = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
>> + u32 gpio = irqd_to_hwirq(d);
>> + unsigned long flags;
>> + u32 value;
>> + void __iomem *grer = gpio_reg(&lnw->chip, gpio, GRER);
>> + void __iomem *gfer = gpio_reg(&lnw->chip, gpio, GFER);
>> +
>> + spin_lock_irqsave(&lnw->lock, flags);
>> + value = readl(grer) & ~BIT(gpio % 32);
>> + writel(value, grer);
>> + value = readl(gfer) & ~BIT(gpio % 32);
>> + writel(value, gfer);
>> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lnw->lock, flags);
>> +};
>> +
>> static struct irq_chip lnw_irqchip = {
>> .name = "LNW-GPIO",
>> .irq_mask = lnw_irq_noop,
>> .irq_unmask = lnw_irq_noop,
>> .irq_set_type = lnw_irq_type,
>> .irq_ack = lnw_irq_noop,
>> + .irq_shutdown = lnw_irq_shutdown,
>> };
>>
>> static DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE(lnw_gpio_ids) = { /* pin number */
>> --
>> 1.7.10.4
>>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists