[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1212202302470.20441@utopia.booyaka.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 23:04:01 +0000 (UTC)
From: Paul Walmsley <paul@...an.com>
To: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>
cc: Venkatraman S <svenkatr@...com>, t-kristo@...com,
Chris Ball <cjb@...top.org>, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: omap_hsmmc: correct precedence of operators
(cc Tero)
Hi,
On Thu, 20 Dec 2012, Sasha Levin wrote:
> With the current code, the condition in the if() doesn't make much sense due to
> precedence of operators.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>
> ---
> drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c
> index bc58078..3ee2664 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c
> @@ -611,7 +611,7 @@ static int omap_hsmmc_context_restore(struct omap_hsmmc_host *host)
> if (host->context_loss == context_loss)
> return 1;
>
> - if (!OMAP_HSMMC_READ(host->base, SYSSTATUS) & RESETDONE)
> + if (!(OMAP_HSMMC_READ(host->base, SYSSTATUS) & RESETDONE))
> return 1;
>
> if (host->pdata->controller_flags & OMAP_HSMMC_SUPPORTS_DUAL_VOLT) {
Makes sense to me, but I wonder if this code is even necessary after:
commit 613ad0e98c3596cd2524172fae2a795c3fc57e4a
Author: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@...com>
Date: Mon Oct 29 22:02:13 2012 -0600
ARM: OMAP: hwmod: wait for sysreset complete after enabling hwmod
? You might just be able to drop those lines completely now.
- Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists