[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1356141435-17340-6-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2012 17:56:55 -0800
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>
Subject: [PATCH 05/25] devfreq: don't use [delayed_]work_pending()
There's no need to test whether a (delayed) work item in pending
before queueing, flushing or cancelling it. Most uses are unnecessary
and quite a few of them are buggy.
Remove unnecessary pending tests from devfreq. Only compile tested.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>
Cc: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>
---
Please let me know how this patch should be routed. I can take it
through the workqueue tree if necessary.
Thanks.
drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c b/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c
index 53766f3..fb4695e 100644
--- a/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c
+++ b/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c
@@ -291,8 +291,7 @@ void devfreq_monitor_resume(struct devfreq *devfreq)
if (!devfreq->stop_polling)
goto out;
- if (!delayed_work_pending(&devfreq->work) &&
- devfreq->profile->polling_ms)
+ if (devfreq->profile->polling_ms)
queue_delayed_work(devfreq_wq, &devfreq->work,
msecs_to_jiffies(devfreq->profile->polling_ms));
devfreq->stop_polling = false;
--
1.8.0.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists