[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1356141435-17340-4-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2012 17:56:53 -0800
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 03/25] sja1000: don't use [delayed_]work_pending()
There's no need to test whether a (delayed) work item in pending
before queueing, flushing or cancelling it. Most uses are unnecessary
and quite a few of them are buggy.
Remove unnecessary pending tests from sja1000. Only compile tested.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
---
Please let me know how this patch should be routed. I can take it
through the workqueue tree if necessary.
Thanks.
drivers/net/can/sja1000/peak_pci.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/can/sja1000/peak_pci.c b/drivers/net/can/sja1000/peak_pci.c
index d84888f..600ac72 100644
--- a/drivers/net/can/sja1000/peak_pci.c
+++ b/drivers/net/can/sja1000/peak_pci.c
@@ -339,8 +339,7 @@ static void peak_pciec_set_leds(struct peak_pciec_card *card, u8 led_mask, u8 s)
*/
static void peak_pciec_start_led_work(struct peak_pciec_card *card)
{
- if (!delayed_work_pending(&card->led_work))
- schedule_delayed_work(&card->led_work, HZ);
+ schedule_delayed_work(&card->led_work, HZ);
}
/*
--
1.8.0.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists