[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121224130801.GC6702@liondog.tnic>
Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2012 14:08:01 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: wei_wang@...lsil.com.cn
Cc: cjb@...top.org, sameo@...ux.intel.com,
devel@...uxdriverproject.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
arnd@...db.de, oakad@...oo.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] MFD:rtsx: Declare that the DMA address limitation is
32bit explicitly
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 02:03:30PM +0800, wei_wang@...lsil.com.cn wrote:
> From: Wei WANG <wei_wang@...lsil.com.cn>
>
> Signed-off-by: Wei WANG <wei_wang@...lsil.com.cn>
> ---
> drivers/mfd/rtsx_pcr.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/rtsx_pcr.c b/drivers/mfd/rtsx_pcr.c
> index fa2c2bc..2ee6be5 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/rtsx_pcr.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/rtsx_pcr.c
> @@ -1084,6 +1084,10 @@ static int __devinit rtsx_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pcidev,
> pci_set_master(pcidev);
> synchronize_irq(pcr->irq);
>
> + ret = pci_set_dma_mask(pcidev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32));
> + if (ret < 0)
> + goto disable_irq;
This piece is deep down in rtsx_pci_probe() and if it fails, the _probe
function has do to all the error unwinding on the error path. Why not
push it up before the pci_enable_device(pcidev) call so in case it
fails, you can save yourself all the needless unwinding?
Oh, and ditto here, commit message is missing.
Thanks.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists