[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121224101134.GB6702@liondog.tnic>
Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2012 11:11:34 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: wei_wang@...lsil.com.cn
Cc: cjb@...top.org, sameo@...ux.intel.com,
devel@...uxdriverproject.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
arnd@...db.de, oakad@...oo.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] MFD:rtsx: Remove redundant code
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 02:03:24PM +0800, wei_wang@...lsil.com.cn wrote:
> From: Wei WANG <wei_wang@...lsil.com.cn>
>
> Signed-off-by: Wei WANG <wei_wang@...lsil.com.cn>
> ---
> drivers/mfd/rtsx_pcr.c | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/rtsx_pcr.c b/drivers/mfd/rtsx_pcr.c
> index 3a44efa..fa2c2bc 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/rtsx_pcr.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/rtsx_pcr.c
> @@ -325,7 +325,6 @@ static void rtsx_pci_add_sg_tbl(struct rtsx_pcr *pcr,
> val = ((u64)addr << 32) | ((u64)len << 12) | option;
>
> put_unaligned_le64(val, ptr);
> - ptr++;
> pcr->sgi++;
Hmm, one has to look at the whole function to understand that the ptr++
statement is actually useless. A sentence or two as a the commit message
wouldn't hurt, IMHO.
Thanks.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists