linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 09/25] wl1251: don't use [delayed_]work

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20121228214218.GG3062@mtj.dyndns.org>
Date:	Fri, 28 Dec 2012 16:42:18 -0500
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	Luciano Coelho <coelho@...com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/25] wl1251: don't use [delayed_]work_pending()

On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 04:14:29PM +0200, Luciano Coelho wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-12-21 at 17:56 -0800, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > There's no need to test whether a (delayed) work item in pending
> > before queueing, flushing or cancelling it.  Most uses are unnecessary
> > and quite a few of them are buggy.
> > 
> > Remove unnecessary pending tests from wl1251.  Only compile tested.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
> > Cc: Luciano Coelho <coelho@...com>
> > Cc: linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org
> > ---
> > Please let me know how this patch should be routed.  I can take it
> > through the workqueue tree if necessary.
> > 
> > Thanks.
> 
> It's probably easier if you take it via your tree.  This driver doesn't
> get patches very often, so I doubt there will be any conflicts.
> 
> Thank you!
> 
> Acked-by: Luciano Coelho <coelho@...com>

Applied to wq/for-3.9-cleanups.  Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/