[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121228214245.GH3062@mtj.dyndns.org>
Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2012 16:42:45 -0500
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/25] rfkill: don't use [delayed_]work_pending()
On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 09:22:13PM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-12-21 at 17:57 -0800, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > There's no need to test whether a (delayed) work item in pending
> > before queueing, flushing or cancelling it. Most uses are unnecessary
> > and quite a few of them are buggy.
> >
> > Remove unnecessary pending tests from rfkill. Only compile
> > tested.
>
> Looks fine to me, feel free to route through your tree -- nobody changes
> rfkill much (famous last words...) :-)
Applied to wq/for-3.9-cleanups w/ your Acked-by added. Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists