[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130102203718.GE11220@mtj.dyndns.org>
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2013 15:37:18 -0500
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
Cc: lizefan@...wei.com, axboe@...nel.dk,
containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ctalbott@...gle.com, rni@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 17/24] blkcg: implement blkcg_policy->on/offline_pd_fn()
and blkcg_gq->online
On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 02:38:28PM -0500, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 12:35:39PM -0800, Tejun Heo wrote:
>
> [..]
> > diff --git a/block/blk-cgroup.h b/block/blk-cgroup.h
> > index 40f5b97..678e89e 100644
> > --- a/block/blk-cgroup.h
> > +++ b/block/blk-cgroup.h
> > @@ -106,12 +106,17 @@ struct blkcg_gq {
> > /* reference count */
> > int refcnt;
> >
> > + /* is this blkg online? protected by both blkcg and q locks */
> > + bool online;
> > +
>
> Hi Tejun,
>
> What does above mean? One needs to take one lock or both the locks to
> check/modify blkg->online.
Needs both locks to modify, so either lock is enough for checking.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists