[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130102204355.GF11220@mtj.dyndns.org>
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2013 15:43:55 -0500
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
Cc: lizefan@...wei.com, axboe@...nel.dk,
containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ctalbott@...gle.com, rni@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 20/24] block: RCU free request_queue
On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 01:48:15PM -0500, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 12:35:42PM -0800, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > RCU free request_queue so that blkcg_gq->q can be dereferenced under
> > RCU lock. This will be used to implement hierarchical stats.
>
> Can we just take a blkg reference on ->q in blkg_alloc() and drop that
> reference in blkg_free(), instead of RCU freeing up queue.
I don't think we can invoke blk_release_queue() from RCU free contxt,
so we can't put request_queue from blkg_rcu_free(). Maybe we can go
through a work item but that's uglier.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists