linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 20/24] block: RCU free request

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 2 Jan 2013 15:43:55 -0500
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
Cc:	lizefan@...wei.com, axboe@...nel.dk,
	containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ctalbott@...gle.com, rni@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 20/24] block: RCU free request_queue

On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 01:48:15PM -0500, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 12:35:42PM -0800, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > RCU free request_queue so that blkcg_gq->q can be dereferenced under
> > RCU lock.  This will be used to implement hierarchical stats.
> 
> Can we just take a blkg reference on ->q in blkg_alloc() and drop that
> reference in blkg_free(), instead of RCU freeing up queue.

I don't think we can invoke blk_release_queue() from RCU free contxt,
so we can't put request_queue from blkg_rcu_free().  Maybe we can go
through a work item but that's uglier.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/