lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <50E5438A.1050902@ti.com> Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2013 14:08:34 +0530 From: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...com> To: R Sricharan <r.sricharan@...com> CC: <ahemaily@...il.com>, <tony@...mide.com>, <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>, <linux@....linux.org.uk>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] arm :omap :DMA: fix a bug on reserving the omap SDMA channels On Thursday 03 January 2013 12:58 PM, R Sricharan wrote: > Hi, > > On Sunday 30 December 2012 02:13 AM, ahemaily@...il.com wrote: >> From: ahemaily <ahemaily@...il.com> >> >> The variable dma_lch_count used for comparison >> (omap_dma_reserve_channels <= dma_lch_count) >> before it initialized to the value from omap_dma_dev_attr : d->lch_count. >> >> I change the place of dma_lch_count initialization to be before the >> comparison. >> >> Signed-off-by: Abdelrahman Hemaily <ahemaily@...il.com> >> --- >> arch/arm/plat-omap/dma.c | 4 ++-- >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/dma.c b/arch/arm/plat-omap/dma.c >> index c76ed8b..cb3e321 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/dma.c >> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/dma.c >> @@ -2014,12 +2014,12 @@ static int __devinit >> omap_system_dma_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) >> >> d = p->dma_attr; >> errata = p->errata; >> - >> + dma_lch_count = d->lch_count; >> + >> if ((d->dev_caps & RESERVE_CHANNEL) && omap_dma_reserve_channels >> && (omap_dma_reserve_channels <= dma_lch_count)) >> d->lch_count = omap_dma_reserve_channels; >> >> - dma_lch_count = d->lch_count; > By removing this line, you are effectively not assigning > d->lch_count after reserving. So the patch should only change > dma_lch_count in the above "if statement" to d->lch_count > You are right. I missed it in last review. Below should be enough. diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/dma.c b/arch/arm/plat-omap/dma.c index 37a488a..555ff7b 100644 --- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/dma.c +++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/dma.c @@ -2019,7 +2019,7 @@ static int __devinit omap_system_dma_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) errata = p->errata; if ((d->dev_caps & RESERVE_CHANNEL) && omap_dma_reserve_channels - && (omap_dma_reserve_channels <= dma_lch_count)) + && (omap_dma_reserve_channels <= d->lch_coun)) d->lch_count = omap_dma_reserve_channels; dma_lch_count = d->lch_count; -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists