linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] arm :omap :DMA: fix a bug on reserving the omap SDMA channels

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <50E5330B.2060007@ti.com>
Date:	Thu, 3 Jan 2013 12:58:11 +0530
From:	R Sricharan <r.sricharan@...com>
To:	<ahemaily@...il.com>
CC:	<tony@...mide.com>, <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux@....linux.org.uk>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] arm :omap :DMA: fix a bug on reserving the omap SDMA
 channels

Hi,

On Sunday 30 December 2012 02:13 AM, ahemaily@...il.com wrote:
> From: ahemaily <ahemaily@...il.com>
>
> The variable  dma_lch_count  used for comparison  (omap_dma_reserve_channels <= dma_lch_count)
> before it initialized to the value from omap_dma_dev_attr : d->lch_count.
>
> I change the place of dma_lch_count initialization to be before the comparison.
>
> Signed-off-by: Abdelrahman Hemaily <ahemaily@...il.com>
> ---
>   arch/arm/plat-omap/dma.c |    4 ++--
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/dma.c b/arch/arm/plat-omap/dma.c
> index c76ed8b..cb3e321 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/dma.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/dma.c
> @@ -2014,12 +2014,12 @@ static int __devinit omap_system_dma_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
>   	d			= p->dma_attr;
>   	errata			= p->errata;
> -
> +	dma_lch_count           = d->lch_count;
> +
>   	if ((d->dev_caps & RESERVE_CHANNEL) && omap_dma_reserve_channels
>   			&& (omap_dma_reserve_channels <= dma_lch_count))
>   		d->lch_count	= omap_dma_reserve_channels;
>
> -	dma_lch_count		= d->lch_count;
    By removing this line, you are effectively not assigning
    d->lch_count after reserving. So the patch should only change
    dma_lch_count in the above "if statement" to d->lch_count

Regards,
  Sricharan


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/