linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/4 v3] net/smsc911x: Provide common clock functionality

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACRpkda-4C+ezaZFSkxsNbmHnBN8RCoCeGePaOF-DzV0XnkzQw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 3 Jan 2013 15:28:42 +0100
From:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Steve Glendinning <steve.glendinning@...well.net>,
	Robert Marklund <robert.marklund@...ricsson.com>,
	linus.walleij@...ricsson.com, arnd@...db.de,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4 v3] net/smsc911x: Provide common clock functionality

On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 12:14 PM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote:

> Some platforms provide clocks which require enabling before the
> SMSC911x chip will power on. This patch uses the new common clk
> framework to do just that. If no clock is provided, it will just
> be ignored and the driver will continue to assume that no clock
> is required for the chip to run successfully.
>
> Cc: Steve Glendinning <steve.glendinning@...well.net>
> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>

Looks all right to me now:
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/