[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMVG2svQkEZtz_kod-ifp1y=pwOPa4ZyRnsayf=oyzHzyRsotw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2013 22:39:33 +0800
From: Daniel J Blueman <daniel@...ra.org>
To: sedat.dilek@...il.com
Cc: alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>
Subject: Re: 3.8-rc2: EFI framebuffer lock inversion...
On 3 January 2013 22:11, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com> wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> just wanted to test the fb-fix [2] from Alan and followed the thread in [1].
> Me is also working with i915 KMS.
>
> I looked at nouveau KMS driver and adapted the part for i915:
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drm.c-200- /* remove conflicting
> drivers (vesafb, efifb etc) */
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drm.c:201: aper = alloc_apertures(3);
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drm.c-202- if (!aper)
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drm.c-203- return -ENOMEM;
>
> Untested by me, feel free to test.
>
> Maybe some of the i915 and/or fb driver experts can comment on the problem.
The structure array from alloc_apertures is just used for the PCI base
address registers, so it's important here.
I'll take a look at the efifb locking later.
Thanks,
Daniel
--
Daniel J Blueman
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists