[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130102.192848.1391048999163570664.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 19:28:48 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: sfr@...b.auug.org.au
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, sony.chacko@...gic.com,
sucheta.chakraborty@...gic.com, sritej.velaga@...gic.com
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree
(net-next tree related)
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2013 14:23:53 +1100
> Caused by commit 13159183ec7a ("qlcnic: 83xx base driver") from the
> net-next tree. Why is this commit adding a function that already exists
> globally?
And this is after I pushed back on this patch series 5 times or so.
You qlogic guys, can you see why I give you such a hard time with
your patch submissions? Even after I ask you to correct all of the
most obvious problems, there is still garbage like this that shows
up in your changes.
What in the world do I have to do, other than push back on your
submissions even harder, to keep crap like this from happening
in the future?
Tell me.
You, as a group, are the absolute worst networking driver submitters.
This is a real problem because you submit large bodies of code that 1)
nobody wants to review and 2) has a very small user base. So you
impart an extremely large burdon upon me, in particular, because I'm
the only person that actually reviews your code at all.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists