[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1357252816.21409.26384.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 14:40:16 -0800
From: Eric Dumazet <erdnetdev@...il.com>
To: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] softirq: reduce latencies
On Thu, 2013-01-03 at 22:08 +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-01-03 at 04:28 -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
> >
> > In various network workloads, __do_softirq() latencies can be up
> > to 20 ms if HZ=1000, and 200 ms if HZ=100.
> >
> > This is because we iterate 10 times in the softirq dispatcher,
> > and some actions can consume a lot of cycles.
> >
> > This patch changes the fallback to ksoftirqd condition to :
> >
> > - A time limit of 2 ms.
> > - need_resched() being set on current task
> [...]
> > --- a/kernel/softirq.c
> > +++ b/kernel/softirq.c
> [...]
> > -#define MAX_SOFTIRQ_RESTART 10
> > +#define MAX_SOFTIRQ_TIME min(1, (2*HZ/1000))
> [...]
>
> Really? Never iterate if HZ < 500?
>
good catch, it should be max()
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists