[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1357250880.2685.29.camel@bwh-desktop.uk.solarflarecom.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2013 22:08:00 +0000
From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
CC: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] softirq: reduce latencies
On Thu, 2013-01-03 at 04:28 -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
>
> In various network workloads, __do_softirq() latencies can be up
> to 20 ms if HZ=1000, and 200 ms if HZ=100.
>
> This is because we iterate 10 times in the softirq dispatcher,
> and some actions can consume a lot of cycles.
>
> This patch changes the fallback to ksoftirqd condition to :
>
> - A time limit of 2 ms.
> - need_resched() being set on current task
[...]
> --- a/kernel/softirq.c
> +++ b/kernel/softirq.c
[...]
> -#define MAX_SOFTIRQ_RESTART 10
> +#define MAX_SOFTIRQ_TIME min(1, (2*HZ/1000))
[...]
Really? Never iterate if HZ < 500?
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings, Staff Engineer, Solarflare
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists