[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1357287351.5452.44.camel@joe-AO722>
Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2013 00:15:51 -0800
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] softirq: reduce latencies
On Thu, 2013-01-03 at 23:49 -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> In various network workloads, __do_softirq() latencies can be up
> to 20 ms if HZ=1000, and 200 ms if HZ=100.
> This patch changes the fallback to ksoftirqd condition to :
> - A time limit of 2 ms.
[]
> diff --git a/kernel/softirq.c b/kernel/softirq.c
[]
> +#define MAX_SOFTIRQ_TIME max(1, (2*HZ/1000))
And if HZ is 10000?
> asmlinkage void __do_softirq(void)
> {
[]
> + unsigned long end = jiffies + MAX_SOFTIRQ_TIME;
Perhaps MAX_SOFTIRQ_TIME should be
#define MAX_SOFTIRQ_TIME msecs_to_jiffies(2)
though it would be nicer if it were a compile time constant.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists