[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1357287786.1678.87.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2013 00:23:06 -0800
From: Eric Dumazet <erdnetdev@...il.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] softirq: reduce latencies
On Fri, 2013-01-04 at 00:15 -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-01-03 at 23:49 -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > In various network workloads, __do_softirq() latencies can be up
> > to 20 ms if HZ=1000, and 200 ms if HZ=100.
> > This patch changes the fallback to ksoftirqd condition to :
> > - A time limit of 2 ms.
>
> []
> > diff --git a/kernel/softirq.c b/kernel/softirq.c
> []
> > +#define MAX_SOFTIRQ_TIME max(1, (2*HZ/1000))
>
> And if HZ is 10000?
>
Then its OK. 2*10000/1000 -> 20 ticks -> 2 ms
> > asmlinkage void __do_softirq(void)
> > {
> []
> > + unsigned long end = jiffies + MAX_SOFTIRQ_TIME;
>
> Perhaps MAX_SOFTIRQ_TIME should be
>
> #define MAX_SOFTIRQ_TIME msecs_to_jiffies(2)
>
> though it would be nicer if it were a compile time constant.
If you send a patch to convert msecs_to_jiffies() to an inline function
when HZ = 1000, I will gladly use it instead of (2*HZ/1000)
Right now, max(1, msecs_to_jiffies(2)) uses way too many instructions,
while it should be the constant 2, known at compile time.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists