[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50E703A8.1080808@wwwdotorg.org>
Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2013 09:30:32 -0700
From: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
To: Prashant Gaikwad <pgaikwad@...dia.com>
CC: mturquette@...aro.org, swarren@...dia.com,
grant.likely@...retlab.ca, linus.walleij@...aro.org,
rob.herring@...xeda.com, maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com,
linux@...sktech.co.nz, josh.cartwright@...com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] clk: tegra: Use common of_clk_init() function
On 01/04/2013 12:00 AM, Prashant Gaikwad wrote:
> Use common of_clk_init() function for clocks initialization.
> drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra20.c | 3 ++-
> drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra30.c | 3 ++-
Oh, so this series is written assuming that the Tegra CCF rework is
already applied then? That makes the dependencies quite painful, since I
think we'll end up with the following order being needed:
1) clk: Add composite clock type
-> This would usually go through the clk tree.
2) The Tegra CCF rework series
-> This must go through the Tegra tree due to lots of dependencies
and merge conflicts with other Tegra patches.
3) This series
-> This would usually go through the clk tree.
Is it possible to re-order the dependencies as (1) (3) (2), so that Mike
can apply (1) and (3) to the clock tree, then I can use the clk tree as
the basis for a branch in the Tegra tree to apply (2) and all the other
Tegra patches that will conflict with (2)?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists